The legless lizards of LAX (2024)

October 2013

Where's the evolution?

Just as all that glimmers is not gold, all that slithers is not snake. That’s because biologists name organisms according to their evolutionary history. Onlyclades— groups that include all and only thelineagesdescended from one ancestral lineage — are given formal scientific names. The namesnakecorresponds with one particular lizard clade: Serpentes.

So snakes are simply a clade of legless lizards. And while Serpentes is the largest and most diverse of these clades, it is certainly not the only one. Leglessness has evolved in more than 20 other clades of lizards! The tree below shows just a few of these clades, including that of the newly discovered species, the genusAnniella.

In the lizard lineage that begot Serpentes (marked on the phylogeny above), legs (as well as eyelids and external ears) were lost. To find out if a legless lizard is a snake, just look for a lack of eyelids and external ears. Snakes are unique in having inherited these traits from theircommon ancestor. However, it’s important to remember that what really makes a particular legless lizard a snake is where on the tree of life its lineage connects, not which particular physical characteristics it has. If, through some twist of fate (and many, many generations of evolutionary change), legs and external ears should evolve in a snake lineage, that lineage would still be a member of the clade Serpentes and so would still be a snake! When it comes to biological names, you just can’t leave your past behind.

Though the new lizard specieslooka lot like snakes to the casual observer, any herpetologist (a biologist who studies reptiles) would easily recognize these critters as legless lizards — and herpetologists have been studying California’s biodiversity for more than a hundred years … so how did these four new species evade detection for so long? Biologists have long known that a species of legless lizard lives in California —Anniella pulchra— but when herpetologists James Parham and Theodore Papenfuss began to study thegenesof that species, the found a lot more diversity than they expected. And this diversity wasn’t random. Lizards collected from the same regions tended to have similar genetic sequences, and the differences between lizards fell out into neat groups. These differences were so significant that they implied reproductive isolation between five major groups of the lizards and that the groups are distinct species.

To investigate, the two biologists studied the lizards in more detail, trying to identify differences in physical traits (i.e.,morphology) that correspond with the genetic divides. Four of the lineages could be readily distinguished from one another by morphological traits (e.g., the lineage now known asA. alexanderaehas a light gray belly, while the lineage designated as the originally named species,A. pulchra, has a yellowish belly). One of the lineages,A. stebbinsi, turned out to be a cryptic species — a species that is not possible to distinguish from others based on morphology alone.

Physical traits help us describe species, but they do not define them. Though the legless lizard species all look quite similar to one another (even the differences among the non-crypticAnniellaspecies are subtle), their genes reveal that they are on separate evolutionary trajectories, as reflected in the phylogeny below — andthatis what matters in determining species boundaries. Species are defined based not on their appearance, but on deeper evolutionary issues: Do the organisms represent discrete evolutionary units? Are there barriers that would prevent them from interbreeding and easily collapsing back into a single lineage? Do their genes reflect these lineage splits? For these slithery non-snakes, the answer appears to be yes.